Showing posts with label invasion. Show all posts
Showing posts with label invasion. Show all posts
Monday, October 3, 2011
Secret Squirrel Ponders A Probable Invasion Of Mexico.
Secret Squirrel has had his attention brought to Mexico,the sad and sorry state it is in at the present,a touch worse and worsening than it is most of the time and has ever been historically.Indeed Mexicans have always been portrayed in US films as mostly criminals,drunks,drugged out and poor,and so it seems at present it is across so very many levels, especially in the areas of the border near to America.It
seems,strangely, the populations there are really ruled,over ruled, and controlled by crime lords, much as in Somalia,who seem to be inundated with weapons of all sorts.The difference between Mexico and Somalia in that area, are that the Somali crime lords are visible, whilst the ones in Mexico remain invisible, but in all cases the crime lords rule they areas they are in.The Americans are becoming concerned and worried by the situation,and Mexico is in high visibility of US government view.
Look here at http://www.military.com/news/article...-collapse.html
Mexico is one of two countries that "bear consideration for a rapid and sudden collapse," according to a report by the U.S. Joint Forces Command on worldwide security threats.The command's "Joint Operating Environment (JOE 2008)" report, which contains projections of global threats and potential next wars, puts Pakistan on the same level as Mexico. "In terms of worse-case scenarios for the Joint Force and indeed the world, two large and important states bear consideration for a rapid and sudden collapse: Pakistan and Mexico."The Mexican possibility may seem less likely, but the government, its politicians, police and judicial infrastructure are all under sustained assault and pressure by criminal gangs and drug cartels. How that internal conflict turns out over the next several years will have a major impact on the stability of the Mexican state. Any descent by Mexico into chaos would demand an American response based on the serious implications for homeland security alone."
So at high levels this state of affairs was seen as developing.
A retired CIA operative,one Sylvia Longmire,has written and informative, enlightening, and perhaps predictable book,inflammatory in title, "Cartel: The Coming Invasion of Mexico's Drug Wars".
At http://www.talkingdrugs.org/a-retired-us-major-general-has-proposed-a-us-invasion-of-mexico
"A retired US Major General has proposed a US invasion of Mexico “to protect and secure the American people.” Major General Paul E. Vallely’s blinkered response to the increase in violence in Mexico, fuelled by US demands for illegal drugs, seems to overlook the failure that a military response has had to curb drug use in the past. He states “now if I were the Commander-in-Chief, I would be on a war-footing and I would have my military commanders planning and executing a strategy that will defeat swiftly and decisively these cancerous enemies.”
He further details, in an article written for the right-wing blog Family Security Matters, how he would conduct his military strategy to protect the USA. He states that the best strategy would be to position three “Border Task Force Groups” of 5000 “warriors” each on the US side of the border. These forces will “conduct offensive and defensive operations on the Mexican side of the border.” Interestingly the retired general does not think that these military incursions into Mexican territory would be in violation of any law and he cites the Posse Comitatus Act of 1848.General Vallely compares the violence in the northern states of Mexico to the lawlessness of 1846 and states “therefore, it is in the National interest of the United States to invade, and restore order because of this clear and present danger to US Citizens and our economy.” So clearly a military invasion of Mexico is in the mind and thoughts of the military."
Gov. Rick Perry,of Texas,as far back as 2010,said he would support sending U.S. troops into Mexico to fight the drug war.He also repeated,at THAT TIME his frequent statement that he doesn't want to be president. Asked if his refusal was "Shermanesque," Perry didn't seem to understand."Shermanesque? Help me on that one," Perry said.The reporter explained it meant if nominated he wouldn't run, if
elected he wouldn't serve."How about Perryesque?" the governor said. "The fact of the matter is I'm not running for the presidency of the United States - don't want to be the president of the United States."Well It seemed it was Perryesque Shermanesque,or Shermanesque Perryesque as you will have it as he has entered his candidacy for the Office Of The President of The United States.Texas Gov. Rick Perry said Saturday,October 1st,2011 that he would consider sending U.S. troops into Mexico to combat drug-related violence and stop it from spilling into the southern United States.“It may require our military in Mexico,” Perry said in answer to a question about the growing threat of drug violence along the southern border. Perry offered no details, and a spokesman, Robert Black, said afterward that sending troops to Mexico would be merely one way of putting an end to the exploding cartel-related violence in the region.
Mexico has been invaded before by America and vast tracts of it's territory were removed from it, and profiftable ares they were at that,perhaps now they consdier going in for it all? Well Let's look at what set the American precedances for invasions of Mexico.
The Mexican–American War, also known as the First American Intervention, the Mexican War, or the U.S.–Mexican War, was an armed conflict between the United States and Mexico from 1846 to 1848 in the wake of the 1845 U.S. annexation of Texas, which Mexico considered part of its territory despite the 1836 Texas Revolution.American forces invaded New Mexico, the California Republic, and parts of what is currently northern Mexico; meanwhile, the American Navy conducted a blockade, and took control of several garrisons on the Pacific coast of Alta California, but also further south in Baja California.
Another American army captured Mexico City, and forced Mexico to agree to the cession of its northern territories to the U.S.The major consequence of the war was the forced Mexican Cession of the territories of Alta California and New Mexico to the U.S. in exchange for $18 million. In addition, the United States forgave debt owed by the Mexican government to U.S. citizens. Mexico accepted the Rio Grande as its national border, and the loss of Texas. Meanwhile gold was discovered in California, which immediately became an international magnet for the California Gold Rush.Quite a profitable undertaking,and it was, as casualties were enormous, but what with the gain, as always, were swept under the rug.
The idea of incorporating Mexico as several new states of the United States has existed ever since the Mexican–American War of 1846–1848, when the All Mexico Movement proposed annexing Mexico by force. Today this idea stresses the strong economic and political connections between Mexico and the United States and the high recurring cost of defending a 2,000-mile (3,200 km) border. In 1913 during border skirmishes between the United States and Mexico, it was proposed by some that the U.S. annex Chihuahua.Incorporating Mexico would add over 100million to the United Satates population, of a mostly subsistance living near starving extremely poor people,heavily equipped with guns of various varities,which have strangely multiplied greatly in recent years.
There have been various break away republics formed within Mexico,but they have been short lived as they were not supported,nor annexed.
The northeast region, consisting of the states of Tamaulipas, Coahuila, and Nuevo León (where claims about federal taxes and water usage are similar to the proposed U.S. states complaints) is frequently alleged to be more alike in general mentality to Texas than to the rest of
Mexico. These three states formed the core of the short-lived 19th century Republic of the Rio Grande.
In 1853, filibuster William Walker conquered the Mexican states of Baja California and Sonora with the intent of adding new slave states to the Union. Within three months he had incorporated both states into the independent Republic of Sonora, but a lack of support from the US Government and increasing pressure from the Mexican Government forced him to retreat.
Mexico could be invaded and annexed of sorts,and split in to states, thence admitted in whole or in part, in to the United States,but there are rules,it seesm they do have them for such doings.Following the precedent established by the Enabling Act of 1802, an Enabling Act must be passed by Congress as a prerequisite to admission. The act authorizes the people of a territory to frame a constitution, and lays down the requirements that must be met prior to consideration for statehood.In light of modern times and American designs, one can easily see the sudden emergence of several constitutions of the required nature, similar in required nature,appearing with great and mysterious speed and rapiditty.
Why would this occur, why ever would America attempt to absorb Mexico? Well Mexico, in spite of it's people being poor, is rather like the Arab states, great in resources.Mexico, America's southern neighbor, has been for centuries and continues to be a hellhole of political corruption, poverty and despair. It is indeed remarkable that a nation this vast, with great resources such as an abundance of oil (Mexico is a major petroleum producer), can be worse off than most Third World countries. It's no secret that Mexico is routinely ranked as the most corrupt
country in the world, even surpassing Nigeria.Mexico is of a much greater vital interest to America than, say, Libya. And, ironically, Mexico also has large oil reserves,(need I mention this again?)and vast natural resources,resources such as petroleum, silver, copper, gold, lead, zinc, natural gas, timber.
Well.........timberrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr,there's oil there, lots and lots of oil and so very close to the USA as well, just admirable for pipelines to suck the oil to the American oil companies,and if it's one thing American oil companies like, and send the USA to wars of acquisition for, and control of, it's oil. Well, let's see the effects of invading Mexico, the possibilities,the probablities,the mechanics of the thing.
First. America has all along denied any purpose to interfere in the internal affairs of Mexico and the St. Louis platform declares against it. Intervention conveys the idea of such interference.And modern blow hard politicians no advocate such intervention,and should they achieve power can and will do it, indeed even yet Obama might.
Second. Intervention would be humiliating to many Mexicans whose pride and sense of national honor would resent severe terms of peace in case of being defeated in a war,which is what the interevention would be.Occupied or defeated, the Mexicans are heavily armed, even yet more heavily armed and spread out and in far greater numbers than were and are the Arabs of Iraq.
Third. American intervention in Mexico is extremely distasteful to all Latin America and might have a very bad effect upon Americas Pan-American program, of peace love and amistad and whatever they call not invading any iof them at any particular moment,for the time being,they'll just have to be placated by telling them, "It won't happen to you,Amistad lad!".That'll do it for sure, and it will too since there's nothing they can do about it in either and all cases.
Fourth. Intervention, which suggests a definite purpose to “clean up” the country, would bind America to certain accomplishments,such as occupation, which circumstances might make extremely difficult or inadvisable,there being so very mandy weapons no round and about and in the hands of Mexicans at large,Mexicans who are wisely ,and ever increasingly,arming themselves with what ever they can get their hands on.
Fifth. Intervention also implies that the war,of intervention would be made primarily in the interest of the Mexican people,it being billed as such, while the fact is it would be an intervention America forces onthe Mexican Government, and, if we term it intervention, we will have considerable difficulty in explaining why we had not intervened before but waited until attacked.
Sixth. Intervention with America's favorite attack group,the Coalition,the NATO Alliance attacking a nation for it's own good, as in all the NATO partners, as in for the oil, share and share alike,which suits all of them just fine,and especially the oil companies who are the huge driving force between all of the present wars of acquisitional intervention(for.............oil).
Will there be an intervention, and invasion of Mexico? Yes I see it in the cards.An acquisitional war of intervention of Mexico? Ye,s but for control and acquisition of natural resources, especially the oil.Will there be an entire absorptive acquistion of Mexico? No,I see that as being far too expensive and a drain an America,a simple less costly occupation is the most likely course of events accomplishing, but at high cost in lives, yes, the control and acquistional farming of Mexico's resources,especially of course, the oil,after all one simply just must make them pay for themselves for having necessitated the military intervention so indicated.I see that as the future of and for Mexico and Mexicans.
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Secret Squirrel,Financial Genius,Doctor's The Economy
Keywords:
monster,raving,loony,party,economics,economy,financial,finances,money,cheques,war,invasion,army
Financing An MRL Britain Through............WAR?? Of Sorts, But Not Quite.
Let’s seriously consider financing,the MRL, and Britain. Let’s look at America, a nation with massive debts, yet poor as it is, they came up with further spending to a debt now encompassing TRILLIONS,by declaring a non war invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and then requisitioning the necessary billions upon billions extra by printing up Treasury Certificates and then going to their Treasury Department and having money printed up against those promisary notes to themselves. Well, if they can do it so can we, as a party we benevolently invade,say Jersey,or perhaps the Channel Islands, Isle of Mann perhaps, cleverly disguised as tourists,without spending on military equipment, etc, without causing damage, merely behaving as tourists,we spend a few months vacationing in disguise, then we decamp back to England, and then claim our BILLIONS!!!!!!!!! Britain can do the same,again, sending a ship or two over to visit Denmark,perhaps, a cruise ship invasion of tourists, people disguised as tourists, behaving as tourists, and then quietly coming home, also claiming BILLIONS for a second invasion!!! Neither Jersey, nor Denmark ,nor anybody else are likely to complain, and everybody will have had a grand time,and they'll not end up looking like Iraq or Afghanistan,everything will be exactly as it is, as it was!! Huzzah!Huzzah!Huzzah!! Sutch is the way of the world, we can’t beat it, then let’s join it!
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister for Re-Deranged Re-Engineering
...........................................................
Secret Squirrel of the MRL Comments on Conservative's Osborne's Economic Plans
Osborne sets out eight-point plan to restore nation's finances (and clear up Tories' mixed messages on spending)
Mr Osborne,Conservative(Tory)...... pledged that if elected he would:
The Shadow Chancellor proposed eight benchmarks for voters to judge his party's performance in power.
.according to the Daily Mail....as seen here....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1247980/George-Osborne-sets-Conservative-plan-restore-nations-finances.html#ixzz0eU1a2lSi
Well the MRL has fathomed ways that his policies could be accomplished, and what's good for everybody is the MRL.............
* Safeguard Britain's credit rating by eliminating a large part of the structural deficit.
Britain's credit rating...........well...eliminating structural deficit, as in debt itself or merely political double speak for throwing out some piles of paper concerning the national debt,that's what they do in India, the man's obviosuly visited and seen how they do it, credit for that though. I outlined a better solution, boils down to my national revolving credit plan, ever dealing with the increasing debt as well..........the revolving credit plan payment of the national debt..........you assign the national debt to a credit card company, you then open multiple credit card accounts for the government, and then you use the credit card company supplied transfer cheques to pay off each credit card company fvromn the other in ever revolving and repetitive fashion, so debts covered, debts paid, A-1 credit rating for Britain, and NO national debt, not yet ever...NO structural deficit at all either, and the government can spend all it wants to as it needs to.
* Boost personal saving, increase exports and business investment.
Well personal saving safeguard?What with banks loosing money, in investments, in mortgages, requiring government bailout, this depends on the governments abilities to continue to bail out the banks, else you'll loose your savings, what is suggested, is, in the basement, or in a corner, go with the medieval barrel banking system,the home banking system, keep the barrel in your home and place your money securely in it,have it securely buried and hidden in the basement, you can't loose, you don't get interest from the banks nowadays anyway, except that they want your money...you want your money too.
* Cut youth unemployment and reduce the number of children in workless households.
Hmmm cut youth unemployment, grand thought, get'em jobs, but where when you've got no jobs, and you've got jobs dropping in numbers and availability,due to foreign firms closing, due to the fact the British firms were and still are sold to foreigners who cut jobs,moved and closed'em....so what's to do..........employ youth cleaning up and sweeping streets and parks, but then that'd add to the national debt as you have to pay them for those created jobs, all be it useful, jobs....best perhaps, laissez faire..however this problem is solved farther on......and, reduce the number of children...............that means birth control....perhaps a system of government ration stamps to allow children when the government requires,or dictated sterilization for the unemployed,mandatory castration on job loss,eh?Whot??
* Increase Britain's international competitiveness by cutting business taxes and regulation.
Well here actually it would do Britain far better to cut personal taxes and regulation,there's more of us than them, and there's far more very much poorer than those who can afford businesses.
* Raise the private sector share of the economy by curbing the state.
Raise the private sector share of the economy, well only affected by doleing out to private BRITISH businesses and businessmen, and encouraging BRITISH private business creation, NOT the foreign as the government has been doing, foreigners don't count in BRITAIN's private sector, as British, they aren't, they're foreigners...as far as curbing the state, well, investment in foreign firms in foreign lands must be chucked in the rubbish bin, curbed as it were, and only investment in Britain permitted,only investment in British firms.
* Increase the productivity of public services.
Increase productivity, well done and said, means more from less that as in more work,less pay, or less workers doing more work, doubling up as it were. Counter productive as it wouldn't deal with unemployment in a good fashion, rather doing the reverse,creating unemployment. Rather better to reduce the amount of work per worker and hiring more workers to do the same job, as in hiring youth and then solving youth unemployment problems.
* Make banks take less risk and offer more credit to small and medium-sized firms.
Well, taking less risk,involves reduced investments and reduced mortgage lending, in short a more secure and guaranteed investment and mortgaging policy. Why not sell Britain through mortgage to Australia,or Japan,the only two nations left that could afford us, which would give Britain then oodles of useful and respected currency, and make Britain Australia's,or Japan's, problem.We could then all move to Australia and live the good life and have a good time as we so justly deserve, or we could simply eat rice till we bung up and look Japanese, and then simply boat over to Japan, who'll notice then.
* Cut greenhouse gas emissions and boost low-carbon industry.
Cut greenhouse gas emissions and boost low carbon...........great idea, compulsory Bean-o tablets for the general public, sheep and cows............elimination of Heinz beans from the national diet, and the mandatory wearing of the newly developed fart filter undies.
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
..........................................................
MRL Solves Financial Crisis Of The Day,By Printing Money,Cheaply.
The core problem in today's financial crisis is that our beliefs about "money" have
been shattered. We have lost faith in our "money". We woke up one morning and
realized "money" wasn't real at all. It was just gone.Well I have discovered the
system of the world that works in tiny third world countries, and in the illusionary
high power economy nation of America.Now ponder this.
A Canadian company by the name British American Banknote Co., based in Ottawa - a
subsidiary of Quebecor- has been printing large amounts of money for Somali
Warlords, as reported in an article from the National Post of Canada on the 23rd
June 99, and probably still does. They pay so much for the printing, and they get
their money, lots more of their currency, printed up for them for their use.It
worked.
Last Tuesday, the U.S. government announced that the budget deficit would reach $9
trillion over the next 10 years—$2 trillion more than previous projections. “That’s
going to be negative for the dollar,” said Adam Boyton, a currency analyst at
Deutsche Bank AG. Seeing the U.S. borrow so much will not increase investors’ faith
in the dollar.The federal deficit/debt wants to try to reach Pluto. The answer is
for the government to ask the Fed to just keep providing blank checks (ie, print
money), ad infinitum.
According to the Telegraph, China has warned a top member of the US Federal Reserve
that it is increasingly disturbed by the Fed's direct purchase of US Treasury bonds.
You see what happens there, is the US government prints up Treasury Bonds, they then
go to the Federal Reserve,which prints up money. It prints up money and buys the
Treasury Bonds from the government(American), thus giving the American government
money, and the keep the Treasury Bonds(later they can shred and recycle them).It
works............So, the US government which didn't have any money at any particular
time, bailed out Enron,bailed out the car companies, ran massively expensive
wars.........all with money it suddenly found it had by simply printing up the none
existent money in to an existent world.
Well, what works for America should work for Britain. I propose we apply a combined
Canadian and American system of printing up money. We use the printed Bond system
that America uses, the British government printing up the bonds, and then have the
Bank Of England buy the bonds, simply printing up the currency as we need, BUT we go
with the cheaper system of having a foreign banknote printing company do the
printing and so realize a greater saving by printing up in a cheaper location.
However, we go one better and perhaps heal our differences with the Zimbabwe
government, and have the Zimbabwe Printing Company print up the required pounds at a
really cheaped rate. Thus we have more money to spend, the government has an
unlimited supply(look at the vast sums the American government procured under its
printing program).Since "money" is essentially a belief system, to solve our problem
we need to recreate that belief system,produce and exhibit more money, increasing
government spending in the private sectors, injecting money in to private
businesses, injecting more money in to governmental social structure! As the French
say,"Laissez Les Bons Temps Roullez", and it is money which makes the good times
roll.Economic problems solved!!!!!!!!!
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
...........................................................................
MRL Cheques To Remain,Money Goes,It Figures,The System Of Tomorrow,Today.
The Labour government wants to get rid of cheques,by 2018, seemingly indicating they
are of the belief that the electorate will keep them in power until such a time.
Well cheques are not the problem,cheques merely represent a paper figure of said
problem...........money...........the problem.money,the root of all evil as they
say. Well..............get rid of cheques we don't get rid of the problem,in fact we
NEED the cheques, THEY must remain, they represent a "figure" of currency, of money
get rid of money therefor and we do get rid of the problem don't we, no problem, no
money...........replaced with what...........figures on paper,the so called
cheques,the bank deposit records,whatever,figures in a computer, figures manipulated
by a plastic card,by a banking book,by an accounting book? YES! Consider........
-- that the same amount of "figures" tomorrow will have the same purchasing power as
the figures of today.Figures do NOT change, face it say pounds 5000 is pounds 5000
at anytime.
--that we will all have access to "figures" via our paychecks(cheques!!!PAY
CHEQUES!!!)tomorrow like we did last week,we need cheques,we need paycheques,we work
for paycheques, which record the "figures" we receive.
--that as a consequence of having access to "figures"...whether by selling our
stocks,bonds or whatever,which have figures printed on them, or receiving a
paycheck,with figures printed on it,or through bank transfers and automatic payments,
we will be able to pay all our bills,with the figures we have available.
--that if we put our "figures" in a bank,by direct deposit , it will be there
tomorrow if we need it.
I woke up one morning and realized "money" wasn't real at all,only "figures" were.
Since "money" is essentially a belief the monetary system, to solve our problem we
need to create a new system that doesn't depend or rely on money.As government,
which invented money, can invent"figures" enough "figures" to pay all debt off with
"new" "figures",figures which retain their value as figures, being figures. Recall
Germany, which suddenly changed their currency, the MARK, they simply printed up new
marks which had more value than the old marks since the printed man on the new mark
wasn't the same as the old mark which was lower in value since the man on it was a
different man.Anyway you look at it a figure,any figure, is just that figure and
nothing else, nothing higher,nothing lower.
So MONEY goes, cheques remain.
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
monster,raving,loony,party,economics,economy,financial,finances,money,cheques,war,invasion,army
Financing An MRL Britain Through............WAR?? Of Sorts, But Not Quite.
Let’s seriously consider financing,the MRL, and Britain. Let’s look at America, a nation with massive debts, yet poor as it is, they came up with further spending to a debt now encompassing TRILLIONS,by declaring a non war invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan, and then requisitioning the necessary billions upon billions extra by printing up Treasury Certificates and then going to their Treasury Department and having money printed up against those promisary notes to themselves. Well, if they can do it so can we, as a party we benevolently invade,say Jersey,or perhaps the Channel Islands, Isle of Mann perhaps, cleverly disguised as tourists,without spending on military equipment, etc, without causing damage, merely behaving as tourists,we spend a few months vacationing in disguise, then we decamp back to England, and then claim our BILLIONS!!!!!!!!! Britain can do the same,again, sending a ship or two over to visit Denmark,perhaps, a cruise ship invasion of tourists, people disguised as tourists, behaving as tourists, and then quietly coming home, also claiming BILLIONS for a second invasion!!! Neither Jersey, nor Denmark ,nor anybody else are likely to complain, and everybody will have had a grand time,and they'll not end up looking like Iraq or Afghanistan,everything will be exactly as it is, as it was!! Huzzah!Huzzah!Huzzah!! Sutch is the way of the world, we can’t beat it, then let’s join it!
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister for Re-Deranged Re-Engineering
...........................................................
Secret Squirrel of the MRL Comments on Conservative's Osborne's Economic Plans
Osborne sets out eight-point plan to restore nation's finances (and clear up Tories' mixed messages on spending)
Mr Osborne,Conservative(Tory)...... pledged that if elected he would:
The Shadow Chancellor proposed eight benchmarks for voters to judge his party's performance in power.
.according to the Daily Mail....as seen here....
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1247980/George-Osborne-sets-Conservative-plan-restore-nations-finances.html#ixzz0eU1a2lSi
Well the MRL has fathomed ways that his policies could be accomplished, and what's good for everybody is the MRL.............
* Safeguard Britain's credit rating by eliminating a large part of the structural deficit.
Britain's credit rating...........well...eliminating structural deficit, as in debt itself or merely political double speak for throwing out some piles of paper concerning the national debt,that's what they do in India, the man's obviosuly visited and seen how they do it, credit for that though. I outlined a better solution, boils down to my national revolving credit plan, ever dealing with the increasing debt as well..........the revolving credit plan payment of the national debt..........you assign the national debt to a credit card company, you then open multiple credit card accounts for the government, and then you use the credit card company supplied transfer cheques to pay off each credit card company fvromn the other in ever revolving and repetitive fashion, so debts covered, debts paid, A-1 credit rating for Britain, and NO national debt, not yet ever...NO structural deficit at all either, and the government can spend all it wants to as it needs to.
* Boost personal saving, increase exports and business investment.
Well personal saving safeguard?What with banks loosing money, in investments, in mortgages, requiring government bailout, this depends on the governments abilities to continue to bail out the banks, else you'll loose your savings, what is suggested, is, in the basement, or in a corner, go with the medieval barrel banking system,the home banking system, keep the barrel in your home and place your money securely in it,have it securely buried and hidden in the basement, you can't loose, you don't get interest from the banks nowadays anyway, except that they want your money...you want your money too.
* Cut youth unemployment and reduce the number of children in workless households.
Hmmm cut youth unemployment, grand thought, get'em jobs, but where when you've got no jobs, and you've got jobs dropping in numbers and availability,due to foreign firms closing, due to the fact the British firms were and still are sold to foreigners who cut jobs,moved and closed'em....so what's to do..........employ youth cleaning up and sweeping streets and parks, but then that'd add to the national debt as you have to pay them for those created jobs, all be it useful, jobs....best perhaps, laissez faire..however this problem is solved farther on......and, reduce the number of children...............that means birth control....perhaps a system of government ration stamps to allow children when the government requires,or dictated sterilization for the unemployed,mandatory castration on job loss,eh?Whot??
* Increase Britain's international competitiveness by cutting business taxes and regulation.
Well here actually it would do Britain far better to cut personal taxes and regulation,there's more of us than them, and there's far more very much poorer than those who can afford businesses.
* Raise the private sector share of the economy by curbing the state.
Raise the private sector share of the economy, well only affected by doleing out to private BRITISH businesses and businessmen, and encouraging BRITISH private business creation, NOT the foreign as the government has been doing, foreigners don't count in BRITAIN's private sector, as British, they aren't, they're foreigners...as far as curbing the state, well, investment in foreign firms in foreign lands must be chucked in the rubbish bin, curbed as it were, and only investment in Britain permitted,only investment in British firms.
* Increase the productivity of public services.
Increase productivity, well done and said, means more from less that as in more work,less pay, or less workers doing more work, doubling up as it were. Counter productive as it wouldn't deal with unemployment in a good fashion, rather doing the reverse,creating unemployment. Rather better to reduce the amount of work per worker and hiring more workers to do the same job, as in hiring youth and then solving youth unemployment problems.
* Make banks take less risk and offer more credit to small and medium-sized firms.
Well, taking less risk,involves reduced investments and reduced mortgage lending, in short a more secure and guaranteed investment and mortgaging policy. Why not sell Britain through mortgage to Australia,or Japan,the only two nations left that could afford us, which would give Britain then oodles of useful and respected currency, and make Britain Australia's,or Japan's, problem.We could then all move to Australia and live the good life and have a good time as we so justly deserve, or we could simply eat rice till we bung up and look Japanese, and then simply boat over to Japan, who'll notice then.
* Cut greenhouse gas emissions and boost low-carbon industry.
Cut greenhouse gas emissions and boost low carbon...........great idea, compulsory Bean-o tablets for the general public, sheep and cows............elimination of Heinz beans from the national diet, and the mandatory wearing of the newly developed fart filter undies.
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
..........................................................
MRL Solves Financial Crisis Of The Day,By Printing Money,Cheaply.
The core problem in today's financial crisis is that our beliefs about "money" have
been shattered. We have lost faith in our "money". We woke up one morning and
realized "money" wasn't real at all. It was just gone.Well I have discovered the
system of the world that works in tiny third world countries, and in the illusionary
high power economy nation of America.Now ponder this.
A Canadian company by the name British American Banknote Co., based in Ottawa - a
subsidiary of Quebecor- has been printing large amounts of money for Somali
Warlords, as reported in an article from the National Post of Canada on the 23rd
June 99, and probably still does. They pay so much for the printing, and they get
their money, lots more of their currency, printed up for them for their use.It
worked.
Last Tuesday, the U.S. government announced that the budget deficit would reach $9
trillion over the next 10 years—$2 trillion more than previous projections. “That’s
going to be negative for the dollar,” said Adam Boyton, a currency analyst at
Deutsche Bank AG. Seeing the U.S. borrow so much will not increase investors’ faith
in the dollar.The federal deficit/debt wants to try to reach Pluto. The answer is
for the government to ask the Fed to just keep providing blank checks (ie, print
money), ad infinitum.
According to the Telegraph, China has warned a top member of the US Federal Reserve
that it is increasingly disturbed by the Fed's direct purchase of US Treasury bonds.
You see what happens there, is the US government prints up Treasury Bonds, they then
go to the Federal Reserve,which prints up money. It prints up money and buys the
Treasury Bonds from the government(American), thus giving the American government
money, and the keep the Treasury Bonds(later they can shred and recycle them).It
works............So, the US government which didn't have any money at any particular
time, bailed out Enron,bailed out the car companies, ran massively expensive
wars.........all with money it suddenly found it had by simply printing up the none
existent money in to an existent world.
Well, what works for America should work for Britain. I propose we apply a combined
Canadian and American system of printing up money. We use the printed Bond system
that America uses, the British government printing up the bonds, and then have the
Bank Of England buy the bonds, simply printing up the currency as we need, BUT we go
with the cheaper system of having a foreign banknote printing company do the
printing and so realize a greater saving by printing up in a cheaper location.
However, we go one better and perhaps heal our differences with the Zimbabwe
government, and have the Zimbabwe Printing Company print up the required pounds at a
really cheaped rate. Thus we have more money to spend, the government has an
unlimited supply(look at the vast sums the American government procured under its
printing program).Since "money" is essentially a belief system, to solve our problem
we need to recreate that belief system,produce and exhibit more money, increasing
government spending in the private sectors, injecting money in to private
businesses, injecting more money in to governmental social structure! As the French
say,"Laissez Les Bons Temps Roullez", and it is money which makes the good times
roll.Economic problems solved!!!!!!!!!
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
...........................................................................
MRL Cheques To Remain,Money Goes,It Figures,The System Of Tomorrow,Today.
The Labour government wants to get rid of cheques,by 2018, seemingly indicating they
are of the belief that the electorate will keep them in power until such a time.
Well cheques are not the problem,cheques merely represent a paper figure of said
problem...........money...........the problem.money,the root of all evil as they
say. Well..............get rid of cheques we don't get rid of the problem,in fact we
NEED the cheques, THEY must remain, they represent a "figure" of currency, of money
get rid of money therefor and we do get rid of the problem don't we, no problem, no
money...........replaced with what...........figures on paper,the so called
cheques,the bank deposit records,whatever,figures in a computer, figures manipulated
by a plastic card,by a banking book,by an accounting book? YES! Consider........
-- that the same amount of "figures" tomorrow will have the same purchasing power as
the figures of today.Figures do NOT change, face it say pounds 5000 is pounds 5000
at anytime.
--that we will all have access to "figures" via our paychecks(cheques!!!PAY
CHEQUES!!!)tomorrow like we did last week,we need cheques,we need paycheques,we work
for paycheques, which record the "figures" we receive.
--that as a consequence of having access to "figures"...whether by selling our
stocks,bonds or whatever,which have figures printed on them, or receiving a
paycheck,with figures printed on it,or through bank transfers and automatic payments,
we will be able to pay all our bills,with the figures we have available.
--that if we put our "figures" in a bank,by direct deposit , it will be there
tomorrow if we need it.
I woke up one morning and realized "money" wasn't real at all,only "figures" were.
Since "money" is essentially a belief the monetary system, to solve our problem we
need to create a new system that doesn't depend or rely on money.As government,
which invented money, can invent"figures" enough "figures" to pay all debt off with
"new" "figures",figures which retain their value as figures, being figures. Recall
Germany, which suddenly changed their currency, the MARK, they simply printed up new
marks which had more value than the old marks since the printed man on the new mark
wasn't the same as the old mark which was lower in value since the man on it was a
different man.Anyway you look at it a figure,any figure, is just that figure and
nothing else, nothing higher,nothing lower.
So MONEY goes, cheques remain.
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Oily Rogues?
Secret Squirrel Comments On Sarah Palin Going Rogue Along With Donald Trump.
Sarah Palin:Going Rogue.............that was the title of her own published work,at least which she claimed was her own, there she self effacingly labelled herself as a rogue, further she has linked with Donald trump who has accepted her calling themselves BOTH, rogues.....well, here it is rogue, as defined in many dictionaries.....they've certainly labelled themselves correctly........
Well...........take your pick............
Rogue.....Defined...........
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue
rogue (rg)
n.
1. An unprincipled, deceitful, and unreliable person; a scoundrel or rascal.
2. One who is playfully mischievous; a scamp.
3. A wandering beggar; a vagrant.
4. A vicious and solitary animal, especially an elephant that has separated itself from its herd.
5. An organism, especially a plant, that shows an undesirable variation from a standard.
adj.
1. Vicious and solitary. Used of an animal, especially an elephant.
2. Large, destructive, and anomalous or unpredictable: a rogue wave; a rogue tornado.
3. Operating outside normal or desirable controls: "How could a single rogue trader bring down an otherwise
profitable and well-regarded institution?" (Saul Hansell).
v. rogued, rogu·ing, rogues
v.tr.
1. To defraud.
2. To remove (diseased or abnormal specimens) from a group of plants of the same variety.
v.intr.
To remove diseased or abnormal plants.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rogue
rogue
/ro?g/ Show Spelled [rohg] Show IPA noun, verb,rogued, ro·guing, adjective
–noun
1.
a dishonest, knavish person; scoundrel.
2.
a playfully mischievous person; scamp: The youngest boys are little rogues.
3.
a tramp or vagabond.
4.
a rogue elephant or other animal of similar disposition.
5.
Biology. a usually inferior organism, esp. a plant, varying markedly from the normal.
–verb (used without object)
6.
to live or act as a rogue.
–verb (used with object)
7.
to cheat.
8.
to uproot or destroy (plants, etc., that do not conform to a desired standard).
9.
to perform this operation upon: to rogue a field.
–adjective
10.
(of an animal) having an abnormally savage or unpredictable disposition, as a rogue elephant.
11.
no longer obedient, belonging, or accepted and hence not controllable or answerable; deviating, renegade: a
rogue cop; a rogue union local.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rogue
Main Entry: 1rogue
Pronunciation: \'rog\
Function: noun
Etymology: origin unknown
Date: 1561
1 : vagrant, tramp
2 : a dishonest or worthless person : scoundrel
3 : a mischievous person : scamp
4 : a horse inclined to shirk or misbehave
5 : an individual exhibiting a chance and usually inferior biological variation
— rogu·ish \'ro-gish\ adjective
— rogu·ish·ly adverb
— rogu·ish·ness noun
.............................................................................
Purveyor's of Snake Oil?
Iraq sits atop 115 billion barrels of crude, the world's third largest proven reserves of conventional crude
oil. But current production of about 2.4 million barrels per day remains well below levels before the 2003
U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.Iraq's oil is the world's cheapest to produce, at a cost of only
about $1 per barrel. The gigantic "rent" on Iraq's oil, during decades of production, could yield company
profits in the range of $4-5 trillion dollars – that is, $4-5 million, millions. Assuming fifty years of
production and 40% royalties, Iraq could yield annual profits of $80-90 billion per year – more than the total
annual profits of the top five companies.Iraq on Friday auctioned the rights to develop some of the world’s
biggest remaining oil fields.
Al-Maliki's government has vowed, based on developers' promises, to raise output to more than 12 million
barrels a day within six to seven years.(Looks good, sounds good, but typicly, as they say, snake oil, the
barrels out depends on how much the oil companies who own the field can pump out at any particulr time).
http://www.finchannel.com/Main_News/Op-Ed/55145_Iraq_Oil_Output_to_Rival_Saudi_Arabia,_if%E2%80%A6/
Iraq Oil Output to Rival Saudi Arabia, if…
Written by Ben Lando
BAGHDAD - What was once considered a pipe-dream could become reality: after decades of dictatorship, war and international sanctions, Iraq’s massive oil reserves are set to be tapped proper and the country once known for two overflowing rivers could be crowned oil king.
If the seven oil projects awarded to foreign oil companies this weekend, and the three from an auction earlier
this year, develop as planned, within eight years, Iraq will see its oil production capacity leap to more than
12 million barrels per day (bpd)....................
ever onwards with yet more.............
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0352857e-e644-11de-bcbe-00144feab49a.html
Iraq set to be second in oil league table
By Carola Hoyos, Chief Energy Correspondent
Iraq is on course to overtake Iran as the holder of the world’s second-largest proven oil reserves, solidifying
its position as the energy industry’s new frontier in the scramble to secure fresh resources.
Baghdad agreed on Friday to deals with Royal Dutch Shell and China’s CNPC for two large oilfields, following on
from similar accords with ExxonMobil, Eni and BP . On Saturday, Lukoil sealed a deal on the West Qurna
field................
and...........yet more............
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/6509767/Shell-and-ExxonMobil-win-Iraq-oil-field-deal.htm
Shell and ExxonMobil win Iraq oil field deal
Shell and ExxonMobil have signed an agreement with Iraq to spend £50bn on developing its second-biggest
oilfield, six months after the war-torn country unsuccessfully tried to auction off major contracts.
By Rowena Mason
The oil giants have secured a deal to develop Iraq’s West Qurna field, which is one of the largest in the
oil-rich south of the country.
Shell will have a 20pc stake and Exxon will have an 80pc stake in the joint venture, boosting production to
2.325m barrels per day...........................
So the United States and the United Kingdom obviously did not wage war on Iraq for the officially stated
reasons. That much is obvious. The America and its British ally were not acting because they feared the Iraqi
government's weapons of mass destruction or its ties with the terrorist group al-Qaeda. Nor were they fighting to bring democracy to the Middle East, a region where the two governments had long supported reactionary monarchs and odious dictators, including Iraqi president Saddam Hussein himself.It was, pure and simply, an invasion to secure the Arab oil fields.Weapons of mass destruction? They're still looking.
(Iran is next on the list).
Sarah Palin:Going Rogue.............that was the title of her own published work,at least which she claimed was her own, there she self effacingly labelled herself as a rogue, further she has linked with Donald trump who has accepted her calling themselves BOTH, rogues.....well, here it is rogue, as defined in many dictionaries.....they've certainly labelled themselves correctly........
Well...........take your pick............
Rogue.....Defined...........
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/rogue
rogue (rg)
n.
1. An unprincipled, deceitful, and unreliable person; a scoundrel or rascal.
2. One who is playfully mischievous; a scamp.
3. A wandering beggar; a vagrant.
4. A vicious and solitary animal, especially an elephant that has separated itself from its herd.
5. An organism, especially a plant, that shows an undesirable variation from a standard.
adj.
1. Vicious and solitary. Used of an animal, especially an elephant.
2. Large, destructive, and anomalous or unpredictable: a rogue wave; a rogue tornado.
3. Operating outside normal or desirable controls: "How could a single rogue trader bring down an otherwise
profitable and well-regarded institution?" (Saul Hansell).
v. rogued, rogu·ing, rogues
v.tr.
1. To defraud.
2. To remove (diseased or abnormal specimens) from a group of plants of the same variety.
v.intr.
To remove diseased or abnormal plants.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rogue
rogue
/ro?g/ Show Spelled [rohg] Show IPA noun, verb,rogued, ro·guing, adjective
–noun
1.
a dishonest, knavish person; scoundrel.
2.
a playfully mischievous person; scamp: The youngest boys are little rogues.
3.
a tramp or vagabond.
4.
a rogue elephant or other animal of similar disposition.
5.
Biology. a usually inferior organism, esp. a plant, varying markedly from the normal.
–verb (used without object)
6.
to live or act as a rogue.
–verb (used with object)
7.
to cheat.
8.
to uproot or destroy (plants, etc., that do not conform to a desired standard).
9.
to perform this operation upon: to rogue a field.
–adjective
10.
(of an animal) having an abnormally savage or unpredictable disposition, as a rogue elephant.
11.
no longer obedient, belonging, or accepted and hence not controllable or answerable; deviating, renegade: a
rogue cop; a rogue union local.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rogue
Main Entry: 1rogue
Pronunciation: \'rog\
Function: noun
Etymology: origin unknown
Date: 1561
1 : vagrant, tramp
2 : a dishonest or worthless person : scoundrel
3 : a mischievous person : scamp
4 : a horse inclined to shirk or misbehave
5 : an individual exhibiting a chance and usually inferior biological variation
— rogu·ish \'ro-gish\ adjective
— rogu·ish·ly adverb
— rogu·ish·ness noun
.............................................................................
Purveyor's of Snake Oil?
Iraq sits atop 115 billion barrels of crude, the world's third largest proven reserves of conventional crude
oil. But current production of about 2.4 million barrels per day remains well below levels before the 2003
U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein.Iraq's oil is the world's cheapest to produce, at a cost of only
about $1 per barrel. The gigantic "rent" on Iraq's oil, during decades of production, could yield company
profits in the range of $4-5 trillion dollars – that is, $4-5 million, millions. Assuming fifty years of
production and 40% royalties, Iraq could yield annual profits of $80-90 billion per year – more than the total
annual profits of the top five companies.Iraq on Friday auctioned the rights to develop some of the world’s
biggest remaining oil fields.
Al-Maliki's government has vowed, based on developers' promises, to raise output to more than 12 million
barrels a day within six to seven years.(Looks good, sounds good, but typicly, as they say, snake oil, the
barrels out depends on how much the oil companies who own the field can pump out at any particulr time).
http://www.finchannel.com/Main_News/Op-Ed/55145_Iraq_Oil_Output_to_Rival_Saudi_Arabia,_if%E2%80%A6/
Iraq Oil Output to Rival Saudi Arabia, if…
Written by Ben Lando
BAGHDAD - What was once considered a pipe-dream could become reality: after decades of dictatorship, war and international sanctions, Iraq’s massive oil reserves are set to be tapped proper and the country once known for two overflowing rivers could be crowned oil king.
If the seven oil projects awarded to foreign oil companies this weekend, and the three from an auction earlier
this year, develop as planned, within eight years, Iraq will see its oil production capacity leap to more than
12 million barrels per day (bpd)....................
ever onwards with yet more.............
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/0352857e-e644-11de-bcbe-00144feab49a.html
Iraq set to be second in oil league table
By Carola Hoyos, Chief Energy Correspondent
Iraq is on course to overtake Iran as the holder of the world’s second-largest proven oil reserves, solidifying
its position as the energy industry’s new frontier in the scramble to secure fresh resources.
Baghdad agreed on Friday to deals with Royal Dutch Shell and China’s CNPC for two large oilfields, following on
from similar accords with ExxonMobil, Eni and BP . On Saturday, Lukoil sealed a deal on the West Qurna
field................
and...........yet more............
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/6509767/Shell-and-ExxonMobil-win-Iraq-oil-field-deal.htm
Shell and ExxonMobil win Iraq oil field deal
Shell and ExxonMobil have signed an agreement with Iraq to spend £50bn on developing its second-biggest
oilfield, six months after the war-torn country unsuccessfully tried to auction off major contracts.
By Rowena Mason
The oil giants have secured a deal to develop Iraq’s West Qurna field, which is one of the largest in the
oil-rich south of the country.
Shell will have a 20pc stake and Exxon will have an 80pc stake in the joint venture, boosting production to
2.325m barrels per day...........................
So the United States and the United Kingdom obviously did not wage war on Iraq for the officially stated
reasons. That much is obvious. The America and its British ally were not acting because they feared the Iraqi
government's weapons of mass destruction or its ties with the terrorist group al-Qaeda. Nor were they fighting to bring democracy to the Middle East, a region where the two governments had long supported reactionary monarchs and odious dictators, including Iraqi president Saddam Hussein himself.It was, pure and simply, an invasion to secure the Arab oil fields.Weapons of mass destruction? They're still looking.
(Iran is next on the list).
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Americans Desert Support Of Britain's Falklands
Keywords:
falklands,argentina,britain,england,america,usa,politics,oil,friends,allies,nato,defence,invasion,attack,war
So, What, A Friend We Have In America
So sings and sang Tony Blair,Gordon Brown,on the behalf,misfortunately,of the people of Britain.............but it really is not so,not in the manner they sang it as......
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=2015164
US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute
Falklands war veterans, one holding up a sign that reads in Spanish "The islands are Argentine," referring to the Falklands islands, demonstrate in front of the National Congress in Buenos Aires, Giles Whittell, Washington and James Bone, New York
Washington refused to endorse British claims to sovereignty over the Falkland Islands yesterday as the diplomatic row over oil drilling in the South Atlantic intensified in London, Buenos Aires and at the UN.
Despite Britain’s close alliance with the US, the Obama Administration is determined not to be drawn into the issue. It has also declined to back Britain’s claim that oil exploration near the islands is sanctioned by international law, saying that the dispute is strictly a bilateral issue..........more at the Timesonline article.but now to comment.........
So the Yanks desert Brits,so what else is new?No mediation, means no sharing,sharing means acknowledge of legitimate claim on the Falklands by the Argentine's, best all not part, not nothing,for Britain.But when UK supports US in it's doings,it's invasion, invasions of lands totally foreign and alien to it, lands,not even which it remotely can state it has any legitimate claim to, shouldn't the US have supported UK in their legitimate quest to utilize their islands,their possession, the Falkland islands, and all drilling is within legitimate international definition of legitimate waters of Britain's Falkland islands! A quest for oil??
We now see the reason, the Argentine's then try to again claim the Falklands for the oil they are not entitled to, anymore than the Americans were and are entitled to the oil of the Iraqis and Afghanis. Indeed we all know of the American invasions of Iraq, and Afghanistan, and know of the great,heavily favoring the US supremely heavily, oil contracts, in those same invaded,conquered,occupied,areas of the world foreign to America, areas invaded on various pretexts such as weapons of mass destruction which were never found, and so called liberations etc.
We also notice the problems with respect to and with Somalia, yet one doesn't see any great USA invasion to bring order to and end piracy,or a mass liberation policy to liberate the people there from repression,human rights violations etc et all........obviously Somalia has no oil so this leaves the USA browned off with respect to Somalia. So in all these invasive events round and about the world, Britain supports America, it's people die for American policies in those foreign lands, and yet when Britain wants support for it's legitimate territories and rights, America, and Americans, desert Britain,the people of Britain? Indeed,yes. It's their thing to do.
Maybe the other reason Obama will not come out in support is because his country is over run with Latino's, plus Obama is said to have made a comment about how his father was treated during the Brit occupation of Kenya by us,but chooses to avoid his treatment of Iraqis taken prisoner in the so called weapons of mass destruction invasion of Iraq.Maybe Obama should hand back the USA to its rightful owners, the red indians. Maybe we should come out and support the Indians on this issue. The same goes with regards to Argentina, hand back Argentina to the South American Indians then maybe we may consider leaving the Falklands to its original owners the Penguins.
The Reason for the lack of Support is easy enough to understand .. the American Oil Special interest groups are hoping that the Seas around the Falklands will supply them with a source of Cheap Oil that they don't have to go to the Middle east to get..So if Argentina gets the Falklands back then America can Squeeze them economically to get the cheapest possible price for Oil..IF the UK However retains the Falklands The OIL companies will sell the Oil on the World Market not something America Wants... this, confirms the USA have no real friendship with us apart from using our boys for cannon fodder.
It also confirms that Britain does not have a friend in America,it is in now way shape or form a friend, and it is time that Britain, and the European nations also realize that they do not have a friend in America,but,they do have each other. All that remains,is that Europe must collectively decide,on a common bond, a band of brothers marching together, unified,one and all, all for one and one for all, a deal with the Falklands situation, decisively,by European action,the Argentinians THEN cannot win. And what will we see, what do they fear,they the Europeans? American turnabout and support of the Argentinians.........and for what.............oil.So let us sing, what a friend we have in America..........Europe must be a friend to itself.
falklands,argentina,britain,england,america,usa,politics,oil,friends,allies,nato,defence,invasion,attack,war
So, What, A Friend We Have In America
So sings and sang Tony Blair,Gordon Brown,on the behalf,misfortunately,of the people of Britain.............but it really is not so,not in the manner they sang it as......
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article7040245.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=2015164
US refuses to endorse British sovereignty in Falklands oil dispute
Falklands war veterans, one holding up a sign that reads in Spanish "The islands are Argentine," referring to the Falklands islands, demonstrate in front of the National Congress in Buenos Aires, Giles Whittell, Washington and James Bone, New York
Washington refused to endorse British claims to sovereignty over the Falkland Islands yesterday as the diplomatic row over oil drilling in the South Atlantic intensified in London, Buenos Aires and at the UN.
Despite Britain’s close alliance with the US, the Obama Administration is determined not to be drawn into the issue. It has also declined to back Britain’s claim that oil exploration near the islands is sanctioned by international law, saying that the dispute is strictly a bilateral issue..........more at the Timesonline article.but now to comment.........
So the Yanks desert Brits,so what else is new?No mediation, means no sharing,sharing means acknowledge of legitimate claim on the Falklands by the Argentine's, best all not part, not nothing,for Britain.But when UK supports US in it's doings,it's invasion, invasions of lands totally foreign and alien to it, lands,not even which it remotely can state it has any legitimate claim to, shouldn't the US have supported UK in their legitimate quest to utilize their islands,their possession, the Falkland islands, and all drilling is within legitimate international definition of legitimate waters of Britain's Falkland islands! A quest for oil??
We now see the reason, the Argentine's then try to again claim the Falklands for the oil they are not entitled to, anymore than the Americans were and are entitled to the oil of the Iraqis and Afghanis. Indeed we all know of the American invasions of Iraq, and Afghanistan, and know of the great,heavily favoring the US supremely heavily, oil contracts, in those same invaded,conquered,occupied,areas of the world foreign to America, areas invaded on various pretexts such as weapons of mass destruction which were never found, and so called liberations etc.
We also notice the problems with respect to and with Somalia, yet one doesn't see any great USA invasion to bring order to and end piracy,or a mass liberation policy to liberate the people there from repression,human rights violations etc et all........obviously Somalia has no oil so this leaves the USA browned off with respect to Somalia. So in all these invasive events round and about the world, Britain supports America, it's people die for American policies in those foreign lands, and yet when Britain wants support for it's legitimate territories and rights, America, and Americans, desert Britain,the people of Britain? Indeed,yes. It's their thing to do.
Maybe the other reason Obama will not come out in support is because his country is over run with Latino's, plus Obama is said to have made a comment about how his father was treated during the Brit occupation of Kenya by us,but chooses to avoid his treatment of Iraqis taken prisoner in the so called weapons of mass destruction invasion of Iraq.Maybe Obama should hand back the USA to its rightful owners, the red indians. Maybe we should come out and support the Indians on this issue. The same goes with regards to Argentina, hand back Argentina to the South American Indians then maybe we may consider leaving the Falklands to its original owners the Penguins.
The Reason for the lack of Support is easy enough to understand .. the American Oil Special interest groups are hoping that the Seas around the Falklands will supply them with a source of Cheap Oil that they don't have to go to the Middle east to get..So if Argentina gets the Falklands back then America can Squeeze them economically to get the cheapest possible price for Oil..IF the UK However retains the Falklands The OIL companies will sell the Oil on the World Market not something America Wants... this, confirms the USA have no real friendship with us apart from using our boys for cannon fodder.
It also confirms that Britain does not have a friend in America,it is in now way shape or form a friend, and it is time that Britain, and the European nations also realize that they do not have a friend in America,but,they do have each other. All that remains,is that Europe must collectively decide,on a common bond, a band of brothers marching together, unified,one and all, all for one and one for all, a deal with the Falklands situation, decisively,by European action,the Argentinians THEN cannot win. And what will we see, what do they fear,they the Europeans? American turnabout and support of the Argentinians.........and for what.............oil.So let us sing, what a friend we have in America..........Europe must be a friend to itself.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Secret Squirrel World,Your World Of The Future
Keywords:defense,secret squirrel,invasion,chunnel,war,transport,air,
train,suicide,bombers,burkas,breasts,aircraft,car,vehicle
The MRL Solution To Prevent A Most Foreign Invasion of England Through Use Of The Chunnel
Secret Squirrel has been busy,studying ways and means to protect Britain from invasion through the Chunnel (The English Channel Tunnel),the thing so most feared that the Chunnel was nor bored through until this day as it were, in these times.Throughout history there have been fears of French invasions of England,Frenchman ,frog eating,snail eating,knarly pickley nosed Frenchman,wearing stripped jerseys, playing ridiculous accordions and saying "Comman,Comman,Comman",and so England invaded France many times in hopes of discouraging them.........but..........what goes around,comes around,and so from France,there even yet was a horrific,yet tiny little one, return invasion.But face it, they're so foreign and french that it was just enough..........too much as a matter of fact, getting them back home was a thunderously obnoxious task.............the men that is, the women could have stayed,it's just that there weren't any women in the french army you know,and what's an army without at least one bint(just look at the Spaniards,they were wise enough to have at least one on each ship, called a "Donna", and ours, we did have,al be it, Mr. Prostitute-it was believed on Britrish ships that it was bad luck to have a woman on board ship,mind you the Titanic proved that to be a scientific proof)................not even yet as
.............as....................as..................you know............well.........hang it all,they're all..............frenchmen,you know,et all.
Well now, how did it all start..typically.........Two centuries ago, the idea of a road tunnel was suggested to Napoleon during a brief peace between France and England in 1802. But war soon broke out again,of course...he couldn't wait.......They guessed that the chalk of Cap Blanc Nez ran under the sea all the way to the white cliffs of Dover - no-one really knew. They imagined horse-drawn carriages driving down a wood-propped tunnel like mines of the day, lit by candles,bringing troops in to England from France for their invasion.........but the idea existed only on paper, due to Napoleon's great problem, he couldn't hold his pants up long enough.
Then in 1869.......Frenchman Thomé de Gamond proposed a scheme,widely accepted in England and France. After making many hazardous solo dives to check the sea-bed, he proposed a rail tunnel, bored through the chalk which he believed ran below the sea-bed.Both countries agreed to work together on a joint tunnel scheme to bring them closer together,they'd become briefly friendly after the Franco-Prussian War.. Engineers began boring trial tunnels from both sides in 1881.
Two tunnel companies started digging seriously in 1881 from the cliffs between Dover and Folkestone, and west of Calais (Sangatte).
Technically, it was a success - driven by compressed air, the boring machines worked well, and there was so little flooding they only switched the pumps on for half a day every two weeks! Within the first year, each side had bored almost 2 km of tunnel, and they expected to complete a 7 foot diameter pilot tunnel across the Channel within 5 years.
The English,we, started on our side,E.W. Watkin promoted Low's scheme and work began at Abbot's Cliff with the excavation of a 7 foot diameter tunnel under the direction of F. Brady, using an early (Beaumont) tunneling machine, which completed 840 yards. It was the moved to Shakespeare Cliff where it completed a tunnel of 2020 yards under the sea towards Dover harbour.The French had completed near as much from their side.
However there was growing fear of French invasion...and so Parliament ordered,wisely, a halt to the project,
since it had aroused alarm amongst the British military, and in 1883, further building of the Tunnel was banned. The Tunnel company suggested (in vain) that, as a safeguard, they could install an inlet to the sea half-way along the tunnel! A soldier would be permanently on guard, ready to pull the plug if the French should try a surprise invasion! However, you know, Parliament well knew that guarding soldiers tended to sleep a lot, remembering the earlier French invasion when England had been asleep.They offered to build a fort guarding the tunnel entrance, and to wire it up with explosives ready to destroy the whole tunnel or flood it with seawater.....
It was no good! The British generals did not trust the French, and that was that. The French tunnelers gave up - believing the British would always be stubborn about staying as an "island fortress".In modern times some they preferred to be referred to as Free French(recall now, that things in french are reverse when traslated to the true English), but in Britain it was generally French Free(when the British Hugenot Inquisition came to Britain that was changed to French Fries).
However.................Present English governments have not learned their lessons from history, and went ahead with the new chunnel project...............and so.....we now have this under the channel tunnel link to France bringing a vast invasion of very foreign foreigners,most defiantely the toul mouthed,mannerless, and most froeign,French..............Onions said I............
It came to my mind that present governments had not seriously taken in to account such an invasion, and other invasions, but had ignored toatally all historical wisdoms and concerns for the safety of the people of England, safety from invasion. There is,for example, NO fort, and certainly not a single flood inlet from the sea to halt any invasion whatsoever. The ancientes in our history had at least take defenses in to consideration of any such tunnel project.Sad they haven't. Onions said I............
And so................I secretly started a study, hidden from ken and mind...............a study so secret that not even those who worked on it knew who was the penultimate source for their secret study.........the study of tunnel (and British), security from foreign invasion through and by the use of......The Chunnel................and so, here now for all to see, the completed work............how to stop a most foreign invasion of England from France(and Europe et all)..............a work completed entirely and conceived entirely by
The International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Centrum for Technical Geoscineces (CTG), Section Engineering Geology, Kanaalweg, Delft, the Netherlands.
Just look now at the direct outcome of the study..........
22 BILLION JARS CONTAINING ROUGHLY 707 BILLION ONIONS AT A COST OF APPROXIMATELY £18.8BN WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY FILL THE TUNNEL AND PREVENT A FRENCH INVASION
How about the centuries’ fear of invasion? The scenario below estimates the required number of pickled onions to fill the tunnel network and cut England off from France in the event of an invasion. The calculation is based on the volumes of the two main tunnels, which are 3.8m in radius and are 50km long, and a service tunnel of 2.4m in radius, which runs parallel to the main tunnels.
Volume of two main tunnels:
3.142 * 3.8m * 3.8m * 50000m * 2 = 4577882 m3
Volume of service tunnel:
3.142 * 2.4m * 2.4m * 50000m * 1 = 913040 m3
If the volumes of connecting tunnels between the service tunnel and the main tunnels and pressure relief tunnels between the two main tunnels are considered...
3.142 * 1.65m * 1.65m * 20m * 134 = 22925 m3
3.142 * 1.0m * 1.0m * 15m * 202 = 9520 m3
(p * r2 * length * number of tunnels = volume)
The total volume adds up to 5.523367 million cubic metres. A quick look at the family jar of pickled onions shows that 32 onions occupy 250ml and that 22 billion jars containing a staggering 707 billion onions at a cost of approximately £18.8bn will be required to completely fill the tunnel and prevent a French invasion.
I am sure, each and every pub in England, stands at the ready to contribute, should the need arise, it's supply of pickled onions, to repel the most foul and foreign invaders!!!! Display your pickled onion jar proudly! Tout it! PLace itt in a glass case, labelled, "In Case Of Emergency,Break Glass."Not your beer mug you silly idiot!
And let me also point out.............that present governments, have NOT embarked on,nor can answer how, THEY would prevent a foreign invasion of England by the use of the Channel tunnel!!!!!!
The MRL! Secret Squirrel!Always Prepared!!
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,(MP,Dunny On The Wold),
Minister for Re-Deranged re-Engineering.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air Train
An M.R.L. Transportation Foreign Investment Review Proposal
The M.R.L. Air Train.......................
Secret Squirrel develops the soon to be famous, Air Train!!
Have you seen the latest BBC lack of intelligence report on the doings in France?? Well now.Here it commences "Air France eyes move to railways.
Air hostess serving food to Air France passenger.
Short-haul Air France passengers could soon be moving onto trains.So the headlines read,but what is the actual truth behind this...Secret Squirrel knows, and so too will you.
Air France is holding talks on a joint venture that could lead to it offering high-speed rail travel.
The airline confirmed reports it was discussing a possible tie-up with Veolia, a French utility firm that also runs several rail services.
Commentators suggest such a deal would enable the airline to cut fuel costs by moving some services onto the railways.
Under the plans Veolia would run trains from Air France's hub airport in Paris to other European destinations.
"We are reviewing the feasibility and possibility of such a project, but it is too early to discuss its terms," an Air France spokesman told the Reuters news agency.
The joint venture is likely to remain focused on international travel as, under European Union plans, legislation is set to free up the international rail passenger market in 2010.
Veolia has previously run public rail franchises in several countries worldwide under the now-defunct Connex brand. It now runs continental Europe's largest private freight service and several rail connections.
With significant improvements being made to the network of high speed rail routes in Europe the potential of such services is improving.
As it confirmed reports of the talks, Air France added it had been looking at launching its own rail links over the past four years as it had been unhappy with the service provided when it had bought rail seats off existing train operators....................................."
Here it ends...........................somewhat, but to every ending,there is a new beginning..............read on.
One recalls, as it brings to mind, the earlier proposal of a Skytrain, however ,they got it all wrong then as well............
Now here's what we,the people of England, those of the M.R.L., do..............
Initially this French idea will never work, the french being French, and all Frenchman equating, we will have the likes of Zarkosy et all looking for the trains at the airports...........in short, for the French this will just never work.
However, we, the English, know better, yes we in the MRL see an excellent investment opportunity. What we all do, is buy Air France from the French.We then also buy their rail system(we were forced to sell ours, the French will just have to be forced to sell theirs.....................we were forced to sell to the foreigners, we will force the French to sell to us foreigners.).
Now, we take the problematical French avions as they call them, lop off the wings, we then mount these on rail boggies and of course, sit'em on the rails, there we pull them by much more fuel economical train engines! Indeed yes, we can easily move hundreds of people by using a simple highly fuel efficient railroad engine!!Indeed to avoid confusion in
France, we simply abolish the Aeroports, or whatever they call them in French, and rename all the train stations to Aeroport or whatever so's not to confuse the French. That would also give us full control of the French rails and airline.
Also it is the best solution all round, fuel savings of absolutely enormous and unimaginable nature,comparing the fuel consumption of the former airliner versus the rail engine,and for the same number of passengers! The mind boggles!!
Less staff would be needed as train type travel is much more economical in terms of utilized and employed staff per unit train.Now they keep saying that airliners are much faster than trains....however, look now at this, one must first get to the airport via whatever means through heavy and slow traffic, time wasted. The time taken to check in and then, give them your baggage, the waiting to board the plane and leave, which is usually much much later than that stated, then on arriving at destination, disembarking, going to collect ones baggage, and then one must go through heavy traffic to ones final resting destination. Obviously there is a great saving in time using train like conditions.
Indeed, had not the government sold the rails to the most foul and extremely foreign foreigners, the same could be done in England should the M.R.L. be able to gain control of government.
(Remember,this proposal comes from Secret Squirrel, who realized at the time that the cabbage was the most useful currency in the U.S.S.R., that the government should start it's own cabbage farms, and hence purchase Aeroflot.......................but...........did they listen....................no...........the M.R.L. and the people of England, are forced to Labor on.................).
Secret Squirrel,
M.R.L.
Minister for Re-Deranged-Re-Engineering.
----------------------------------------------
M.R.L. Short Distance Travel Solution
Secret Squirrel has pondered short distance air travel problems.
Everyone has experienced some sort of discomfort on short trips,
county to county. If using airplane there is a problem now what
with security delays etc. making such flights a nuisance. Bus
skeds are seemingly never quite right with respect to departure
times, arrival times,return times etc.
However there is a solution to the problem, taken from available
technology from medieval times and from modern times.
The solution to these county to county travel trips is quite
simply a catapult, launching the traveler complete with his or
her luggage, and, at a suitable time in their flight, the proper
altitude of launch achieved, a para glider parachute opens
allowing the passenger to guide themselves to land, on their feet,
at quite the proper wished landing point.
Secret Squirrel
MRL
Minister for Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secret Squirrel's Intelligence Gathering Report on So Called Burka Wearing Suicide Terrorist Bombers.
Secret Squirrel has discovered the actual truth behind burka bombers.It's actually fake breasts which are exploding due to rather interestng causes.
It has come to light that what have been attributed to terrorist suicide bombings are in fact actually not so. Indeed it has been surmised that it is a plot by the breast implant companies trying to hide defective breast implants. It has been suggested that the horrific explosions by these so-called silicon implants may be in part and possibly due to the inadvertent misuse,misapplication of the explosive known as plastique.....indeed that huge stockpiles of these plastique explosives were in fact used as breast implants.
It has been noted in intelligence circles and anybody else who can see, that the explosions involve those wearing burkas. Now in the Arab world burkas are worn by females, those who have......breasts. Undoubtedly the explosion of the implants can result from the immense buildup of heat associated with
1) the location of the things in question,
2) being inside hidden by a burka causing buildup of heat, and
3) being in an extremely hot climate magnifying the effects of the temperatures such that the plastique is caused to explode.
It is noted that the explosions taking place horrifically on the chest area do with horrendous effects cause the head of the person who exploded to fly off.This is a direct indication of sudden breast explosion, not suicide belts as have been formerly indicated. The belt is worn about the waist, and such an explosion would not and could not cause the head to fly off and the rest of the body to remain somewhat intact, but would in fact cause the explsion of the body to separate the body round and about the waist, the head could not possibly be made to fly off.
Now whilst there is no acknowledgement of such occurrences beyond the fact that people in burkas in Arab lands and elsewhere suddenly tend to explode spontaneously,it is advised that it is best to avoid persons wearing burkas for safety reasons. It also might be best to avoid those females who have these artificial breast implants, Pamela Anderson for example,Brittany Spears,church groups have condemned her wiggling and jiggling as provocatively explosive in its effects on society, Jennifer Anniston for another.......assuming you have one brain cell left.......while they do not wear burkas, there has been discussion and theoretical ponderings that they may suddenly explode in an aircraft for example, should there be a sudden loss of pressure in the aircraft, the explosive decompression theory that such breast would rapidly expand resulting in a horrific and shattering explosion affecting those around them in similar fashion to the sudden explosion burka events.
Indeed it is proveable that some aircraft have suffered catastrophic explosive decompressions. How in the world can a small hole shatter an airliner so completely? Nay! Not by the event and the hole itself, but by the sympathetic explosive detonation of a pair of false breasts.Yet more proof...........The first airline to have a credible plan to transport its passengers to outer space, is Virgin Galactic. The airline has identified a potential risk factor for space travel. According to a Virgin Galactic spokesperson:
Bosses fear the implants may expand and burst due to cabin pressure, according to The Sun.
Better safe than sorry........be warned...........be very warned.
They're here........now......they're real..their breasts are not, remember the so-called Hollywood Hot Spot.....laden with females with fake breasts....they're there, beside you, perhaps they stewardess, she's bending over in front of you, there they are....waiting to explode out..............there in Arab lands.............a burka approaching........
Be very very warned.
Secret Squirrel,
M.R.L.,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M.R.L. Approved British Made Car Prototype
Secret Squirrel here suggests a cost effective British built car,a vehicle of the future,today!Yes, Britain can return to car manufacture!!The Most Cost Effective Vehicle Ever!!
Secretly in a local Shanghai suburb, one man has created what has to be one of the most cost effective automobiles ever. China was chosen for the British car prototype due to the immense secrecy which can only be achieved in China, imagine American Automobile manufacturers attacking this latest threat to their former domination of the vehicular market.
The car has a very simple design, basically a bunch of wood scraps tied together with wire, four wheels, and a seat that can barely fit one person.
An open frame allows for a nice breeze, so an air conditioner is not required, and it even has a headlight.
No word on the gas mileage this things gets, but all in all the vehicle is pretty impressive, and fuel mileage will be dependent on the engine finally selected for the production vehicle, and will be available in economical single and much more powerful dual cylinder, four stroke and two stroke engine versions but on our budget it is anticipated to be very much like a lawnmower engine painted red.
Production models will be modified to include a convertable roof, and expanded by use of a tow ball to tow a trailer to increase versatility, and also allow for use of said trailer as a Rumble/Jump seat.
All that remains, what with the collapse of the American car manufacturers, is to jump in to an ever expanding market with a suitable British made production version.
-Secret Squirrel.
----------------------------------------------------------------
train,suicide,bombers,burkas,breasts,aircraft,car,vehicle
The MRL Solution To Prevent A Most Foreign Invasion of England Through Use Of The Chunnel
Secret Squirrel has been busy,studying ways and means to protect Britain from invasion through the Chunnel (The English Channel Tunnel),the thing so most feared that the Chunnel was nor bored through until this day as it were, in these times.Throughout history there have been fears of French invasions of England,Frenchman ,frog eating,snail eating,knarly pickley nosed Frenchman,wearing stripped jerseys, playing ridiculous accordions and saying "Comman,Comman,Comman",and so England invaded France many times in hopes of discouraging them.........but..........what goes around,comes around,and so from France,there even yet was a horrific,yet tiny little one, return invasion.But face it, they're so foreign and french that it was just enough..........too much as a matter of fact, getting them back home was a thunderously obnoxious task.............the men that is, the women could have stayed,it's just that there weren't any women in the french army you know,and what's an army without at least one bint(just look at the Spaniards,they were wise enough to have at least one on each ship, called a "Donna", and ours, we did have,al be it, Mr. Prostitute-it was believed on Britrish ships that it was bad luck to have a woman on board ship,mind you the Titanic proved that to be a scientific proof)................not even yet as
.............as....................as..................you know............well.........hang it all,they're all..............frenchmen,you know,et all.
Well now, how did it all start..typically.........Two centuries ago, the idea of a road tunnel was suggested to Napoleon during a brief peace between France and England in 1802. But war soon broke out again,of course...he couldn't wait.......They guessed that the chalk of Cap Blanc Nez ran under the sea all the way to the white cliffs of Dover - no-one really knew. They imagined horse-drawn carriages driving down a wood-propped tunnel like mines of the day, lit by candles,bringing troops in to England from France for their invasion.........but the idea existed only on paper, due to Napoleon's great problem, he couldn't hold his pants up long enough.
Then in 1869.......Frenchman Thomé de Gamond proposed a scheme,widely accepted in England and France. After making many hazardous solo dives to check the sea-bed, he proposed a rail tunnel, bored through the chalk which he believed ran below the sea-bed.Both countries agreed to work together on a joint tunnel scheme to bring them closer together,they'd become briefly friendly after the Franco-Prussian War.. Engineers began boring trial tunnels from both sides in 1881.
Two tunnel companies started digging seriously in 1881 from the cliffs between Dover and Folkestone, and west of Calais (Sangatte).
Technically, it was a success - driven by compressed air, the boring machines worked well, and there was so little flooding they only switched the pumps on for half a day every two weeks! Within the first year, each side had bored almost 2 km of tunnel, and they expected to complete a 7 foot diameter pilot tunnel across the Channel within 5 years.
The English,we, started on our side,E.W. Watkin promoted Low's scheme and work began at Abbot's Cliff with the excavation of a 7 foot diameter tunnel under the direction of F. Brady, using an early (Beaumont) tunneling machine, which completed 840 yards. It was the moved to Shakespeare Cliff where it completed a tunnel of 2020 yards under the sea towards Dover harbour.The French had completed near as much from their side.
However there was growing fear of French invasion...and so Parliament ordered,wisely, a halt to the project,
since it had aroused alarm amongst the British military, and in 1883, further building of the Tunnel was banned. The Tunnel company suggested (in vain) that, as a safeguard, they could install an inlet to the sea half-way along the tunnel! A soldier would be permanently on guard, ready to pull the plug if the French should try a surprise invasion! However, you know, Parliament well knew that guarding soldiers tended to sleep a lot, remembering the earlier French invasion when England had been asleep.They offered to build a fort guarding the tunnel entrance, and to wire it up with explosives ready to destroy the whole tunnel or flood it with seawater.....
It was no good! The British generals did not trust the French, and that was that. The French tunnelers gave up - believing the British would always be stubborn about staying as an "island fortress".In modern times some they preferred to be referred to as Free French(recall now, that things in french are reverse when traslated to the true English), but in Britain it was generally French Free(when the British Hugenot Inquisition came to Britain that was changed to French Fries).
However.................Present English governments have not learned their lessons from history, and went ahead with the new chunnel project...............and so.....we now have this under the channel tunnel link to France bringing a vast invasion of very foreign foreigners,most defiantely the toul mouthed,mannerless, and most froeign,French..............Onions said I............
It came to my mind that present governments had not seriously taken in to account such an invasion, and other invasions, but had ignored toatally all historical wisdoms and concerns for the safety of the people of England, safety from invasion. There is,for example, NO fort, and certainly not a single flood inlet from the sea to halt any invasion whatsoever. The ancientes in our history had at least take defenses in to consideration of any such tunnel project.Sad they haven't. Onions said I............
And so................I secretly started a study, hidden from ken and mind...............a study so secret that not even those who worked on it knew who was the penultimate source for their secret study.........the study of tunnel (and British), security from foreign invasion through and by the use of......The Chunnel................and so, here now for all to see, the completed work............how to stop a most foreign invasion of England from France(and Europe et all)..............a work completed entirely and conceived entirely by
The International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC), Centrum for Technical Geoscineces (CTG), Section Engineering Geology, Kanaalweg, Delft, the Netherlands.
Just look now at the direct outcome of the study..........
22 BILLION JARS CONTAINING ROUGHLY 707 BILLION ONIONS AT A COST OF APPROXIMATELY £18.8BN WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY FILL THE TUNNEL AND PREVENT A FRENCH INVASION
How about the centuries’ fear of invasion? The scenario below estimates the required number of pickled onions to fill the tunnel network and cut England off from France in the event of an invasion. The calculation is based on the volumes of the two main tunnels, which are 3.8m in radius and are 50km long, and a service tunnel of 2.4m in radius, which runs parallel to the main tunnels.
Volume of two main tunnels:
3.142 * 3.8m * 3.8m * 50000m * 2 = 4577882 m3
Volume of service tunnel:
3.142 * 2.4m * 2.4m * 50000m * 1 = 913040 m3
If the volumes of connecting tunnels between the service tunnel and the main tunnels and pressure relief tunnels between the two main tunnels are considered...
3.142 * 1.65m * 1.65m * 20m * 134 = 22925 m3
3.142 * 1.0m * 1.0m * 15m * 202 = 9520 m3
(p * r2 * length * number of tunnels = volume)
The total volume adds up to 5.523367 million cubic metres. A quick look at the family jar of pickled onions shows that 32 onions occupy 250ml and that 22 billion jars containing a staggering 707 billion onions at a cost of approximately £18.8bn will be required to completely fill the tunnel and prevent a French invasion.
I am sure, each and every pub in England, stands at the ready to contribute, should the need arise, it's supply of pickled onions, to repel the most foul and foreign invaders!!!! Display your pickled onion jar proudly! Tout it! PLace itt in a glass case, labelled, "In Case Of Emergency,Break Glass."Not your beer mug you silly idiot!
And let me also point out.............that present governments, have NOT embarked on,nor can answer how, THEY would prevent a foreign invasion of England by the use of the Channel tunnel!!!!!!
The MRL! Secret Squirrel!Always Prepared!!
Secret Squirrel,
MRL,(MP,Dunny On The Wold),
Minister for Re-Deranged re-Engineering.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Air Train
An M.R.L. Transportation Foreign Investment Review Proposal
The M.R.L. Air Train.......................
Secret Squirrel develops the soon to be famous, Air Train!!
Have you seen the latest BBC lack of intelligence report on the doings in France?? Well now.Here it commences "Air France eyes move to railways.
Air hostess serving food to Air France passenger.
Short-haul Air France passengers could soon be moving onto trains.So the headlines read,but what is the actual truth behind this...Secret Squirrel knows, and so too will you.
Air France is holding talks on a joint venture that could lead to it offering high-speed rail travel.
The airline confirmed reports it was discussing a possible tie-up with Veolia, a French utility firm that also runs several rail services.
Commentators suggest such a deal would enable the airline to cut fuel costs by moving some services onto the railways.
Under the plans Veolia would run trains from Air France's hub airport in Paris to other European destinations.
"We are reviewing the feasibility and possibility of such a project, but it is too early to discuss its terms," an Air France spokesman told the Reuters news agency.
The joint venture is likely to remain focused on international travel as, under European Union plans, legislation is set to free up the international rail passenger market in 2010.
Veolia has previously run public rail franchises in several countries worldwide under the now-defunct Connex brand. It now runs continental Europe's largest private freight service and several rail connections.
With significant improvements being made to the network of high speed rail routes in Europe the potential of such services is improving.
As it confirmed reports of the talks, Air France added it had been looking at launching its own rail links over the past four years as it had been unhappy with the service provided when it had bought rail seats off existing train operators....................................."
Here it ends...........................somewhat, but to every ending,there is a new beginning..............read on.
One recalls, as it brings to mind, the earlier proposal of a Skytrain, however ,they got it all wrong then as well............
Now here's what we,the people of England, those of the M.R.L., do..............
Initially this French idea will never work, the french being French, and all Frenchman equating, we will have the likes of Zarkosy et all looking for the trains at the airports...........in short, for the French this will just never work.
However, we, the English, know better, yes we in the MRL see an excellent investment opportunity. What we all do, is buy Air France from the French.We then also buy their rail system(we were forced to sell ours, the French will just have to be forced to sell theirs.....................we were forced to sell to the foreigners, we will force the French to sell to us foreigners.).
Now, we take the problematical French avions as they call them, lop off the wings, we then mount these on rail boggies and of course, sit'em on the rails, there we pull them by much more fuel economical train engines! Indeed yes, we can easily move hundreds of people by using a simple highly fuel efficient railroad engine!!Indeed to avoid confusion in
France, we simply abolish the Aeroports, or whatever they call them in French, and rename all the train stations to Aeroport or whatever so's not to confuse the French. That would also give us full control of the French rails and airline.
Also it is the best solution all round, fuel savings of absolutely enormous and unimaginable nature,comparing the fuel consumption of the former airliner versus the rail engine,and for the same number of passengers! The mind boggles!!
Less staff would be needed as train type travel is much more economical in terms of utilized and employed staff per unit train.Now they keep saying that airliners are much faster than trains....however, look now at this, one must first get to the airport via whatever means through heavy and slow traffic, time wasted. The time taken to check in and then, give them your baggage, the waiting to board the plane and leave, which is usually much much later than that stated, then on arriving at destination, disembarking, going to collect ones baggage, and then one must go through heavy traffic to ones final resting destination. Obviously there is a great saving in time using train like conditions.
Indeed, had not the government sold the rails to the most foul and extremely foreign foreigners, the same could be done in England should the M.R.L. be able to gain control of government.
(Remember,this proposal comes from Secret Squirrel, who realized at the time that the cabbage was the most useful currency in the U.S.S.R., that the government should start it's own cabbage farms, and hence purchase Aeroflot.......................but...........did they listen....................no...........the M.R.L. and the people of England, are forced to Labor on.................).
Secret Squirrel,
M.R.L.
Minister for Re-Deranged-Re-Engineering.
----------------------------------------------
M.R.L. Short Distance Travel Solution
Secret Squirrel has pondered short distance air travel problems.
Everyone has experienced some sort of discomfort on short trips,
county to county. If using airplane there is a problem now what
with security delays etc. making such flights a nuisance. Bus
skeds are seemingly never quite right with respect to departure
times, arrival times,return times etc.
However there is a solution to the problem, taken from available
technology from medieval times and from modern times.
The solution to these county to county travel trips is quite
simply a catapult, launching the traveler complete with his or
her luggage, and, at a suitable time in their flight, the proper
altitude of launch achieved, a para glider parachute opens
allowing the passenger to guide themselves to land, on their feet,
at quite the proper wished landing point.
Secret Squirrel
MRL
Minister for Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Secret Squirrel's Intelligence Gathering Report on So Called Burka Wearing Suicide Terrorist Bombers.
Secret Squirrel has discovered the actual truth behind burka bombers.It's actually fake breasts which are exploding due to rather interestng causes.
It has come to light that what have been attributed to terrorist suicide bombings are in fact actually not so. Indeed it has been surmised that it is a plot by the breast implant companies trying to hide defective breast implants. It has been suggested that the horrific explosions by these so-called silicon implants may be in part and possibly due to the inadvertent misuse,misapplication of the explosive known as plastique.....indeed that huge stockpiles of these plastique explosives were in fact used as breast implants.
It has been noted in intelligence circles and anybody else who can see, that the explosions involve those wearing burkas. Now in the Arab world burkas are worn by females, those who have......breasts. Undoubtedly the explosion of the implants can result from the immense buildup of heat associated with
1) the location of the things in question,
2) being inside hidden by a burka causing buildup of heat, and
3) being in an extremely hot climate magnifying the effects of the temperatures such that the plastique is caused to explode.
It is noted that the explosions taking place horrifically on the chest area do with horrendous effects cause the head of the person who exploded to fly off.This is a direct indication of sudden breast explosion, not suicide belts as have been formerly indicated. The belt is worn about the waist, and such an explosion would not and could not cause the head to fly off and the rest of the body to remain somewhat intact, but would in fact cause the explsion of the body to separate the body round and about the waist, the head could not possibly be made to fly off.
Now whilst there is no acknowledgement of such occurrences beyond the fact that people in burkas in Arab lands and elsewhere suddenly tend to explode spontaneously,it is advised that it is best to avoid persons wearing burkas for safety reasons. It also might be best to avoid those females who have these artificial breast implants, Pamela Anderson for example,Brittany Spears,church groups have condemned her wiggling and jiggling as provocatively explosive in its effects on society, Jennifer Anniston for another.......assuming you have one brain cell left.......while they do not wear burkas, there has been discussion and theoretical ponderings that they may suddenly explode in an aircraft for example, should there be a sudden loss of pressure in the aircraft, the explosive decompression theory that such breast would rapidly expand resulting in a horrific and shattering explosion affecting those around them in similar fashion to the sudden explosion burka events.
Indeed it is proveable that some aircraft have suffered catastrophic explosive decompressions. How in the world can a small hole shatter an airliner so completely? Nay! Not by the event and the hole itself, but by the sympathetic explosive detonation of a pair of false breasts.Yet more proof...........The first airline to have a credible plan to transport its passengers to outer space, is Virgin Galactic. The airline has identified a potential risk factor for space travel. According to a Virgin Galactic spokesperson:
Bosses fear the implants may expand and burst due to cabin pressure, according to The Sun.
Better safe than sorry........be warned...........be very warned.
They're here........now......they're real..their breasts are not, remember the so-called Hollywood Hot Spot.....laden with females with fake breasts....they're there, beside you, perhaps they stewardess, she's bending over in front of you, there they are....waiting to explode out..............there in Arab lands.............a burka approaching........
Be very very warned.
Secret Squirrel,
M.R.L.,
Minister For Re-Deranged Re-Engineering.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
M.R.L. Approved British Made Car Prototype
Secret Squirrel here suggests a cost effective British built car,a vehicle of the future,today!Yes, Britain can return to car manufacture!!The Most Cost Effective Vehicle Ever!!
Secretly in a local Shanghai suburb, one man has created what has to be one of the most cost effective automobiles ever. China was chosen for the British car prototype due to the immense secrecy which can only be achieved in China, imagine American Automobile manufacturers attacking this latest threat to their former domination of the vehicular market.
The car has a very simple design, basically a bunch of wood scraps tied together with wire, four wheels, and a seat that can barely fit one person.
An open frame allows for a nice breeze, so an air conditioner is not required, and it even has a headlight.
No word on the gas mileage this things gets, but all in all the vehicle is pretty impressive, and fuel mileage will be dependent on the engine finally selected for the production vehicle, and will be available in economical single and much more powerful dual cylinder, four stroke and two stroke engine versions but on our budget it is anticipated to be very much like a lawnmower engine painted red.
Production models will be modified to include a convertable roof, and expanded by use of a tow ball to tow a trailer to increase versatility, and also allow for use of said trailer as a Rumble/Jump seat.
All that remains, what with the collapse of the American car manufacturers, is to jump in to an ever expanding market with a suitable British made production version.
-Secret Squirrel.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)