Secret Squirrel has noticed some cities have begun to ban the
plastic bag, unwisely so,the self same, highly useful,recyclable,plastic
bag found in virtually all stores,noticing that in Toronto,Canada, a
strange event occurred with respect to the plastic bag. The Mayor wished
City Council there to remove a 5 cent fee ordered to be charged by
stores for plastic bag use, well, council then strangely turned around
and came up with a plastic bag ban. Well plastic bags are not actually
the horrible monster they are made out to be. Did you know that it takes
more than four times as much energy to manufacture a paper bag as it
does to manufacture a plastic bag.
In 1999, 14 million trees were
cut to produce the 10 billion paper grocery bags used by Americans that
year alone and paper sacks generate 70% more air and 50 times more
water pollutants than plastic bags.It takes 91% less energy to recycle a
pound of plastic than it takes to recycle a pound of paper and plastic
bags are in fact fully recyclable. Many households even yet do use the
bags as garbage bags, placing kitchen wastes in them and then placing
them in garbage.
Yes, indeed, it is much more sanitary to use
these bags in such an environmental use, indeed they prevent many germs
and smells, by containing them.Indeed though these bags ,the store bags,
won't be able to be used for that purpose, having been banned in any
stated city, the people will continue in sanitary fashion to use other
plastic bags, so called garbage bags you know, for the same qualities
that they have in the field of sanitation purposes, so the bags do end
up in the landfill after all, just replaced by other plastic bags under a
different name. Now, they claim that the plastic bags don't break
down,well, they do, in the landfill, yes indeed,they do.
I have
plastic pails left outside and after the year these pails are breaking
down and apart, hardly durable, you know. they are
disintegrating.Current research demonstrates that paper in today's
landfills does not degrade or break down at a substantially faster rate
than plastic does. In fact, nothing completely degrades in modern
landfills because of the lack of water, light, oxygen and other
important elements that are necessary for the degradation process to be
completed. A paper bags takes up more space than a plastic bag in a
landfill, but because paper is recycled at a higher rate, saving space
in landfills is less of an issue.
http://www.biofuelswatch.com has some nice data concerning plastic bags, of the type used in stores.
1.
First, most of the plastic bags in common usage are made from
polyethylene-a type of plastic. Polyethylene is good, because it can, in
its raw form, be manipulated to assume any colour, shape, form or size
desired. It is inherently versatile.
2. Polyethylene is also very
durable and watertight, making it an ideal carrier of heavy goods,
especially tins bottles and cans being carried in bulk.
3. Despite the fact that it is not endlessly recyclable, polyethylene can be re-used again and again.
4.
Plastic bags can be melted and remoulded, and can subsequent be
remoulded and made into plastic lumber in order to be used on such
things as park benches and in fencing material.
5. Studies into
the effects on energy consumption and pollution effects have shown that
the polyethylene used in the manufacture of plastic bags requires far
lower levels of energy than those paper bags made form 3-% recycled
fibres.
6. Similar studies have indicated that plastic bags also
emit lower levels of both solid waste and greenhouse gases. We also know
that any collected plastic bags are capable of being burned in order to
generate electricity, which can contribute to lowering sulphur
emissions produced by burning fossil fuels like coal.It's a question of
use, collect for recycle, recycle, or burn for energy generational uses.
There are yet more arguments for plastic bags (against a ban)
- Low production costs, only a few chemicals are needed - Production requires little energy and generates only low emissions
- Low weight, high strength
- Resistant to water and chemicals
- Easy to process, can be sealed
- Fundamentally recyclable
Let's
compare to paper bags using government data.... The United States
Environmental Protection Agency says paper bags are worse for the
environment than plastic. Plastic bags require much less energy to
manufacture, ship and recycle and because of this plastic generates less
greenhouse gas. Plastic bags cause less air and water pollution. They
compress to a small size in landfills.They are a known sterile method
for transporting food products and preventing food borne illness(
especially used as garbage containment bags,as plastic bags or other
designated types will continue to be used for, face it, garbage is not
messy,es smelly, and if not used, garbage trucks will revert to their
horrendously smelly nature, speeding through the streets as the
sanitation workers attempt to escape the horrific smell of their own
slimy,sloppy,disease ridden smell generating truck.)
To go on about the subject of plastic bags....
Light
weight nature requires less energy consumption during transportation
compared to paper with a 7:1 advantage. Many studies comparing plastic
bags versus paper bag show that plastic bags have less net environmental
effect than paper bags, requiring less energy to produce, transport and
recycle; however these studies also note that recycling rates for
plastic are significantly lower than for paper. Plastic carrier bags can
be reused as trash bags or bin bags. According to the Australian
government most bags are reused as bin liners. Plastic bags can be
recycled through some grocery store take-back programs When it comes to
concerns about their impact on the environment The EPA was quoted in an
interview saying…”consumers shouldn't stress too much, as long as
they're recycling or reusing store bags, said Chris Newman, an
environmental scientist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.”
Further
plastic is a green alternative at the checkout. Plastic bag
manufacturing is often mistakenly identified as having a larger carbon
footprint than paper bag manufacturing. As confirmed by the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality, plastic bags actually have a lower
carbon footprint than paper ones – which use 17 times more water to
produce and create five times the pollution. Moreover, plastic bags
generate 80 percent less waste than paper bags, and take up less space
in landfills. Secret Squirrel feels very strongly that it is unwise to
ban plastic bags, and that it is environmentally unsound showboating by
city governments in attempts to show themselves as being "green" in
nature through a very unwise environmentally unfounded decision.
No comments:
Post a Comment